India not a dharamshala: Supreme Court junks Sri Lankan's plea against deportation

In a pivotal ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Sri Lankan national's plea against deportation, asserting that India cannot serve as a "dharamshala" for global refugees. The petitioner, who had been seeking refuge in India, was convicted under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), highlighting the country's firm stance on national security and immigration policies. The court's decision underscores India's broader approach to dealing with international refugees, emphasizing the need to balance humanitarian considerations with legal and security concerns. By rejecting the plea, the court reinforced the principle that India is not obligated to provide indefinite sanctuary, especially in cases involving serious criminal convictions like those under the UAPA. This ruling may influence future cases involving foreign nationals seeking asylum in India. The petitioner, having served a seven-year jail term, is now set to be deported back to Sri Lanka. This development marks a significant moment in India's legal landscape, reflecting the judiciary's commitment to uphold national integrity while navigating the complex dynamics of refugee protection. As discussions on refugee policies continue globally, India's decision may resonate with other nations grappling with similar challenges.

— Authored by Next24 Live